We use cookies on our website to show you content we think is relevant to you, to manage the technical operations of our website, and analyse our traffic to further improve our website. We may share information about your use of our site with our social media, advertising and analytics partners. By clicking "Accept", you agree to the use of all cookies as described in our Cookie statement or "Do not accept" to only use cookies strictly necessary for the functioning of the site.

Wholesale Banking

Good COP, Bad COP: Separating heat from light at the climate summit

COP26 was described as the 'last best chance' to save the planet. It probably hasn't delivered on that. Countries' climate plans still don't add up enough to meet the Paris Agreement; the final text does not sufficiently address the financial needs of the most vulnerable countries. That said, COP26 was far from pointless

The president of the COP26 summitThe President of the COP26 summit, Alok Sharma

More countries than ever commit to net-zero but short-term plans remain vague and inadequate 

33 new countries, including Brazil, Argentina and most notably India, announced net-zero targets at COP26. That brings the overall share of emissions covered by net-zero targets to around 90% of global emissions. India weighs in most, although its net-zero target applies for 2070, while other major countries aim for 2050 or 2060.

Thanks to the positive momentum of new announcements – notably on methane, deforestation and net-zero targets – updated analyses now show that in a best-case scenario, if all announcements are met in full and on time, they could hold global warming to 1.8°C by the end of the century. Still above the 1.5°C target, but a great improvement from the 2.7°C increase at the start of the meeting.

Read full article on Think